As we have previously highlighted, the federal government’s forty independent federal agencies receive too little attention relative to their importance to our collective safety and prosperity. The Revolving Door Project has worked through multiple channels to shed light on these overlooked agencies and the threats that they face. We hope public education will generate pressure to safeguard the independence of these agencies and ensure that they are staffed with advocates for the public interest rather than corporate insiders.
Central to this work is our Independent Federal Agency Monitor. This monitor is a unique tool which tracks “appointments to agency leadership positions through the confirmation process and beyond,” giving the public access to previously opaque, scattered information. By bringing this information together in a centralized database, the Monitor helps the public to think about the de-centralized regulatory apparatus more holistically.
In order to elevate this unique tool and encourage more members of the public and advocates alike to make use of it, we release monthly summaries of topline statistics that capture the current state of the independent federal agencies. We hope that these numbers will help drive home the severity of this issue and will generate more pressure to find a solution.
There are 40 independent federal agencies. Collectively, these bodies have a total of 179 voting board members who require Senate confirmation, with agency boards ranging from 3 to 11 people. 30 of those agencies require a political balance, meaning that there can only be a certain number of members from the same political party.
Ongoing Staffing Problems*:
Of the aforementioned 179 positions, 42 are filled by members/commissioners who are serving expired terms (the same as last month). 20 of those terms expired prior to President Trump taking office and 1 expired prior to President Obama taking office. Those 42 members have served on average 990 days, or just under 3 years, past the end of their term.
In addition to these expired seats, 41 seats are vacant (down 3 from the month before). In total that makes 83 seats that are either expired or vacant, almost half of the total. There are only 30 pending nominations to fill these seats, a mere fraction of the total. That is 2 fewer nominations than there were last month. Moreover, only 10 people have been confirmed to independent agency boards since the start of the 116th Congress. Only 4 people were confirmed in May. President Trump put forward 2 new nominations this month.
The boards of 2 agencies lack a quorum, limiting or crippling their decision-making power.** Those agencies are the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) - which has 0 members - and the United States Postal Service (USPS).
The MSPB has 3 vacancies out 3 positions, 2 short of a quorum. 2 of those seats are for Republicans and 1 is for a Democrat. The President has advanced 3 nominations, 1 for a Democratic seat and 2 for Republican seats.
The USPS has 7 vacancies out of 11 positions, 2 short of a quorum, 4 of those vacancies are for Republican seats and 3 are for Democratic seats. The President has advanced 4 nominations, 3 for Republican seats and 1 for a Democratic seat.
2 nominations for the MSPB board and 2 of the nominations for the USPS board (enough in each case to restore a quorum) have been voted out of committee, leaving Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell as the only obstacle to their confirmation. The nominees for the MSPB were voted out of committee in mid-February yet McConnell has yet to hold a vote to confirm them despite his having deployed a “nuclear option” that makes confirmation votes for these positions fast and easy.
A quorum was restored this month to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Export-Import Bank (EIB).
Only 18 agencies’ boards have no vacancies, while 10 have one vacancy, 8 have two vacancies, and 4 have three or more vacancies.
There are 5 agency boards whose sitting members/commissioners are all serving expired terms. They are the Federal Election Commission (FEC), the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB), the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC), the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM), and the United States Parole Commission (USPC).
Many of these agencies’ boards are statutorily designed to be politically balanced. The President selects nominees from his own party but, for appointees of the opposing party, generally nominates those recommended to him by senior Senators of that party.*** To avoid partisan battles, nominations for vacancies are often, though not always, advanced in pairs made up of one Democrat and one Republican. In the absence of a natural pair nominations will advance alone. This President, however, has chosen to break with precedent and has consistently put forward nominations for Republican seats without a corresponding Democratic partner even when they put boards out of political balance.****
Despite there being more Republican than Democratic positions at these agencies, a majority of vacancies are for Democratic seats. Of 148 seats on politically-balanced boards, at present 85 are either occupied by, or reserved for, Republican nominees versus 63 for Democratic nominees. 16 of those 85 Republican seats are vacant versus 16 of the 63 Democratic seats. That is an 18 percent vacancy rate for Republican seats versus a 25 percent rate for Democratic ones. Similarly, 20 of the members serving expired terms are Republicans (for 24 percent of total Republican seats) and 17 are Democrats (27 percent of total Democratic seats). Despite this near parity, recent nominations have not been evenly distributed. President Trump has 18 pending Republican nominations to boards requiring a political balance. This is still far short of the 36 total Republican seats that are not in good standing, but it is also far better than the 9 pending nominations for Democratic seats that nominations that he has put forward for the 33 Democratic seats that are either vacant or expired.
* Rules governing personnel at these agencies diverge frequently. Many, but not all, allow sitting Commissioners to remain for some period of time after their term expires but before being replaced, and of those agencies, some allow Commissioners on an expired term to remain in office indefinitely.
** Agencies vary with respect to what powers are lost in the absence of a quorum.
*** Norris, Floyd, “Independent Agencies, Sometimes in Name Only,” The New York Times, Aug. 8, 2013, https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/09/business/independent-agencies-sometimes-in-name-only.html
**** Senator Sherrod Brown to President Donald Trump, April 23, 2019, Website of United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. https://www.banking.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/4.23.2019%20SB%20to%20DJT%20re%20FDIC%20Nominees%20FINAL%20to%20PDF.pdf