Falling employer-provided health insurance has hit low-wage workers
hardest. Low-wage workers, who are already less likely than high-wage workers to
receive health insurance from their own employer, are also less likely to
receive such coverage as a dependent on another family member’s plan. In
2002, less than half (47.3 percent) of low-wage workers had employer-provided
health insurance, either from their own employer or another family
member’s, while nine-in-ten (89.7 percent) high-wage workers had such
coverage.
As workers have lost employer-provided health insurance,
some have begun to turn to Medicaid or the State Child Health Insurance Program
(SCHIP), which extended Medicaid to the children of the working poor. The share
of families in which members received both employer-provided health insurance
and Medicaid grew over the past decade, between 1992 and 2002. This share grew
most for Latinos and low-wage workers. By 2002, one in eight (11.8 percent)
Latinos lived in mixed private-public health insurance families, as did 8.7
percent of low-wage workers.
Much of the switch from employer-provided health insurance to Medicaid has been among children. The share of children living in a family receiving Medicaid in which at least one family member also received employer-provided health insurance more than doubled between 1992 and 2002, rising from 4.4 to 11.1 percent. Over the same time period, the share of children who were uninsured but living in a family where someone had employer-provided health insurance nearly doubled, rising from 4.6 to 8.3 percent.
Table 1.
Employer-provided health insurance coverage through own or other family member's
employer
|
|||||
|
Share with coverage |
||||
|
During the
Year
|
|
All
Year
|
||
|
1999
|
2002
|
|
1999
|
2002
|
All under age 65
|
71.7%
|
70.3%*
|
|
64.0%
|
61.6%*
|
Female
|
72.4
|
71.2*
|
|
65.1
|
63.2*
|
Male
|
71.0
|
69.3*
|
|
62.8
|
60.0*
|
White
|
77.2
|
76.7*
|
|
69.9
|
68.8*
|
African-American
|
60.7
|
59.1*
|
|
52.1
|
49.2*
|
Latino
|
53.2
|
48.8*
|
|
44.1
|
33.6*
|
Other
|
62.3
|
65.0*
|
|
52.9
|
55.0*
|
Age group
|
|||||
18
- 24
|
59.9
|
58.7*
|
|
45.7
|
43.9*
|
25
- 34
|
68.2
|
66.0*
|
|
58.7
|
55.8*
|
35
- 44
|
75.9
|
73.8*
|
|
69.7
|
66.5*
|
45
- 54
|
77.7
|
75.7*
|
|
72.7
|
69.3*
|
55
- 64
|
71.4
|
71.9
|
|
64.8
|
64.5
|
Adults (18 - 64)
|
|||||
Employed
|
81.0
|
80.6*
|
|
73.4
|
72.2*
|
Not-employed
|
50.6
|
49.2*
|
|
42.5
|
40.2*
|
Low-Wage
|
60.4
|
59.6*
|
|
49.2
|
47.3*
|
High-Wage
|
94.4
|
94.3
|
|
90.1
|
89.7*
|
Small
Firms
|
74.8
|
75.2
|
|
65.5
|
65.5*
|
Large
Firms
|
86.1
|
85.6*
|
|
79.1
|
77.9*
|
Addendum:
|
|||||
Children
|
64.5
|
62.0*
|
|
56.2
|
51.5*
|
Elderly
|
36.1
|
39.1*
|
|
25.8
|
25.8*
|
Source: CEPR analysis of Survey of Income and Program
Participation, 96 and 02 panels.
|
|||||
Note: To increase sample
size, we pooled estimates for Latinos across two years (92/93, 98/99, 01/02).
|
|||||
* Indicates that change from
past year is significant at the 5 percent level
|
|
If someone in a family gets
health insurance from an employer, nearly all individuals in that family are on
an employer-provided health plan (Table 2). This share fell slightly, from 90.5 to 89.3%
over the most recent economic contraction, between 1999 and 2002. Over this
time period, the share of individuals living in a family where someone else had
employer-provided health insurance but they received Medicaid grew by 1.7
percentage points, from 3.8 to 5.5 percent, an increase of 45
percent.
Table 2. Health
insurance coverage among individuals in families with at least one
person with employer-provided health insurance |
|
||||||||||||
|
At
all during year |
|
|||||||||||
|
Share
with employer-provided insurance |
|
Share
with Medicaid |
|
Share
without health insurance |
|
|||||||
|
1999 |
2002 |
|
1992 |
1999 |
2002 |
|
1992 |
1999 |
2002 |
|
||
All under age 65 |
90.5 |
89.3* |
|
3.0 |
3.8* |
5.5* |
|
4.9 |
5.9* |
6.6* |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
(a) Adults (18 - 64) |
92.1 |
91.8* |
|
2.4 |
3.1* |
3.3* |
|
5.0 |
5.5* |
5.9* |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Women |
92.7 |
92.4* |
|
3.1 |
3.3* |
3.7* |
|
3.8 |
4.8* |
5.1* |
|
||
Men |
91.5 |
91.2* |
|
1.8 |
2.8* |
2.9 |
|
6.3 |
6.3* |
6.7* |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
White |
94.2 |
94.3* |
|
1.9 |
2.4* |
2.6 |
|
3.7 |
3.9* |
3.9 |
|
||
African-American |
88.0 |
86.6* |
|
5.4 |
6.2* |
6.0 |
|
9.9 |
7.9* |
9.6* |
|
||
Latino |
78.6 |
73.1* |
|
7.1 |
6.9 |
11.8* |
|
17.2 |
17.6* |
20.7* |
|
||
Other |
86.4 |
89.5* |
|
2.7 |
5.5* |
4.8* |
|
6.6 |
9.5* |
6.8* |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Age group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
18 - 24 |
79.6 |
79.6* |
|
3.6 |
3.9* |
5.1* |
|
11.4 |
14.8* |
15.7* |
|
||
25 - 34 |
89.7 |
90.1* |
|
2.0 |
2.5* |
2.6 |
|
6.9 |
8.4* |
8.0* |
|
||
35 - 44 |
96.0 |
94.7* |
|
1.2 |
1.8* |
2.0* |
|
2.9 |
3.1* |
4.1* |
|
||
45 - 54 |
95.9 |
94.9* |
|
1.6 |
2.4* |
2.5 |
|
2.9 |
2.5* |
3.5* |
|
||
55 - 64 |
93.5 |
93.8* |
|
5.6 |
6.7* |
6.1* |
|
3.1 |
2.6* |
2.5 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employed |
94.9 |
95.0* |
|
0.8 |
1.2* |
1.3 |
|
3.3 |
4.3* |
4.3 |
|
||
Not-employed |
82.6 |
81.9* |
|
7.5 |
9.6* |
9.7 |
|
10.5 |
9.9* |
10.9* |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Low-Wage |
86.9 |
86.7* |
|
2.1 |
2.8* |
3.2* |
|
8.7 |
10.7* |
11.3* |
|
||
High-Wage |
98.9 |
99.0 |
|
0.2 |
0.4* |
0.4 |
|
0.5 |
0.9* |
0.8 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Small Firms |
93.0 |
93.4 |
|
|
1.7 |
1.9* |
|
|
5.4 |
5.4 |
|
||
Large Firms |
96.0 |
96.1* |
|
|
1.0 |
1.2* |
|
|
3.4 |
3.5 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
(b) Children (under
18) |
86.3 |
82.9* |
|
4.4 |
5.7* |
11.1* |
|
4.6 |
6.9* |
8.3* |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Girls |
86.3 |
83.0* |
|
4.3 |
5.9* |
11.2* |
|
4.7 |
7.2* |
8.2* |
|
||
Boys |
86.4 |
82.7* |
|
4.5 |
5.5* |
11* |
|
4.5 |
6.7* |
8.4* |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
White |
90.6 |
88.2* |
|
2.4 |
3.5* |
7.0* |
|
2.9 |
4.8* |
6.1* |
|
||
African-American |
75.1 |
71.5* |
|
12.9 |
13.1* |
21.9* |
|
8.7 |
11.3* |
12.0* |
|
||
Latino |
76.2 |
68.0* |
|
12.3 |
11.1* |
22.4* |
|
17.3 |
17.5* |
19.5* |
|
||
Other |
85.0 |
81.8* |
|
4.5 |
9.1* |
13.4* |
|
5.0 |
7.8* |
9.4* |
|
||
Source: CEPR analysis of Survey of Income and Program Participation, 96 and 02 panels |
|||||||||||||
Notes:
The percent of children in families with at least one person with
employer-provided health insurance (EPHI) who report having both |
|||||||||||||
* Indicates that change from past year is significant at the 5% level |
Children make up the bulk of Medicaid recipients who live in families in which someone is on an employer-provided health insurance plan. Between 1999 and 2002, the share of child Medicaid recipients living in a family where other members had employer-provided health insurance more than doubled, growing by 5.4 percentage points, up to 11.1 percent. The share grew most for Latino and African American children. By 2002, the share of child Medicaid recipients living in a family where at least one member had employer-provided health insurance grew by 8.8 percentage points for African American children, up to 21.9 percent, and by 11.3 percentage points for Latino children, up to 22.4 percent.
In 1999, Congress expanded Medicaid to cover more children in low-income families through the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). The increase in Medicaid for children may be a result of the SCHIP expansion because the share of children in families where someone had employer-provided health insurance but the child is without any health insurance coverage increased relatively slightly. Between 1999 and 2002, the share of children without health insurance grew by 1.4 percentage points, from 6.9 to 8.3 percent.