Article • Dean Baker’s Beat the Press
The Musk-Trump Big Lie on Social Security

Article • Dean Baker’s Beat the Press
Fact-based, data-driven research and analysis to advance democratic debate on vital issues shaping people’s lives.
Center for Economic and Policy Research
1611 Connecticut Ave. NW
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20009
Tel: 202-293-5380
Fax: 202-588-1356
https://cepr.net
Back during the campaign JD Vance began running around saying that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio were eating the pets of their neighbors. When reporters went to Springfield they couldn’t find any evidence of pet-eating Haitians.
The police and city’s mayor said they had not heard any reports of dogs or cats ending up as a neighbor’s dinner. There were reports of some tensions with the new immigrants, but none involved pet consumption.
When Vance was confronted with the fact he had spread a lie, rather backing down, he said that he was proud that he had lied in order to call attention to the inflow of immigrants to Springfield and other parts of the country. He basically said that if lying about pet eating was necessary to call attention to immigration, then he would gladly do it.
This is how we should understand Elon Musk and Donald Trump’s frequently repeated lie about millions of dead people getting Social Security. While neither may be geniuses, both have been frequently told by those who know the program that this claim is absurd.
There are a small number of payments that are made to people a month or two after they died. Most of this money is subsequently returned to the program. The idea that payments are being made to millions of people who died years or even decades ago is absurd on its face.
But Musk and Trump keep repeating this zombie Social Security lie for the same reason that JD Vance lied about pet-eating immigrants, they want to convince the public of something that is not true. In the case of Vance, the point was to scare people about immigrants who came to this country work. The overwhelming majority put in long days, at unpleasant jobs, that pay low wages. We can argue about the economic impact, but they do not pose a threat to our safety. Vance told his lie to convince people otherwise.
Social Security is an incredibly popular program which in fact is also incredibly efficient. The administrative costs of its retirement program are less than 0.4 percent of the benefits paid out each year. The instances of fraud are rare, although in a program that pays out $1,400,000,000,000 in benefits each year, it will not be zero.
Given its overwhelming popularity, Musk and Trump could never hope to be able to attack Social Security if they had to rely on actual evidence. Instead, their best hope is to convince people that the program faces financial problems because of massive fraud. They also are deliberately trying to screw up its operations with mass firings in an already understaffed agency. The Musk-Trump effort is designed to make a very efficient program, that provides essential income to tens of millions of people, a basket case that can’t process claims and get people’s checks right.
Behind it all, they will have the Big Lie, about million of dead people getting Social Security benefits. This will be yet another story of the government being unable to get things done. Trump will tell us that we have to turn Social Security over to the more efficient private sector, where people like Elon Musk (a.k.a. “Mr. Exploding Rockets) can sort things out.
There isn’t very much that’s subtle about the Musk-Trump crew. They openly lie about everything in the world and they even tell us they lie. And when they tell us they lie, we should believe them.