Article Artículo
NPR Makes the Case Against Patent Monopolies in Prescription DrugsDean Baker / January 12, 2013
Article Artículo
The NYT Thinks that Medicare Should Lead to Intergenerational ConflictDean Baker / January 12, 2013
Article Artículo
Three Years Later: A Round-up of News and CommentaryCEPR / January 11, 2013
Article Artículo
Haïti en chiffres, trois ans plus tardCEPR
10 Janvier, 2013
En anglais
CEPR / January 11, 2013
Article Artículo
Timothy Geithner: Modern Day MetternichDean Baker
The Guardian Unlimited, January 11, 2013
Dean Baker / January 11, 2013
Article Artículo
Mais espaço para debate Qua VenezuelaMark Weisbrot / January 11, 2013
Article Artículo
Pressure Builds on UN to Take Responsibility as Cholera Still Far From “Under Control”Port-au-Prince – The origin of Haiti’s deadly cholera outbreak is not much in doubt, at least not to anybody outside the U.N. A host of scientific studies have all pointed to UN troops whose waste made it in to the largest river in Haiti as the source. While the U.N. has yet to accept responsibility, it has announced an initiative to raise funds for a $2.2 billion 10-year cholera eradication plan. At this point however, no official plan even exists, at least not publicly. Meanwhile, pressure continues to build for the U.N. to do more, and put up its own funds rather than just relying on notoriously unreliable donor pledges. The U.N. said it would chip in $23 million for the plan, a mere 1 percent of what is needed. This compares to the nearly $1.9 billion that the U.N. has spent since the earthquake on the troops that brought cholera to Haiti.
As we have previously noted, Haitian President Martelly recently added his voice to the chorus, saying that “certainly” the U.N. should take responsibility and that “[t]he U.N. itself could bring money to the table.” Grassroots pressure both within Haiti and outside has also increased. More than 25,000 have signed an online petition created by Oliver Stone calling on the U.N. to take action and secure the needed funding. And while it has been over 14 months since over 5,000 Haitians demanded reparations for those affected and for the U.N. to invest in the needed infrastructure, as of yet there has been no formal response from the U.N.
Cholera Not “Under Control”
In the meantime, cholera continues to wreak havoc throughout the country. Although the number of cases and deaths has dropped this year, the epidemic still sickened over 110,000 and killed 900, making cholera more prevalent in Haiti than anywhere else in the world. Nevertheless, the Haitian Health Minister took to the radio a few days ago to talk about the “success” of the cholera response; the Prime Minister has previously declared the epidemic to be “under control”. The U.N. recently lauded the efforts of the government and humanitarian actors for managing “to contain the spread of cholera in 2012.”
But despite the statements of success, the ability to respond to the epidemic continues to decrease. From August of 2011 to August of 2012 the number of cholera treatment centers has decreased from 38 to 20, while the number of treatment units has decreased from 205 to 71. Funding to respond to the outbreak is decreasing as NGOs struggle to get donors interested in an epidemic over two years old. While funding comes in fits and starts after a hurricane or devastating storm, the response needs consistent support so as to be prepared for those emergencies rather than just a response to them.
As one health expert who asked to remain anonymous noted, while the number of cases may slow slightly next year because of the natural progression of the disease, “2013 will be even worse than 2012.” With the number of health facilities dwindling and humanitarian actors pulling out, it is likely that the mortality rate could actually increase in 2013, according to the expert.
Jake Johnston / January 11, 2013
Article Artículo
Latin America and the Caribbean
Más espacio para el debate sobre VenezuelaMark Weisbrot / January 10, 2013
Article Artículo
Letter to Sen. Toomey on Threat to Force Government Default Unless Entitlements are CutDean Baker / January 10, 2013
Article Artículo
Rewriting History: James Buchanan and the National DebtDean Baker / January 10, 2013
Article Artículo
On Budget Cuts, the Political Gap Is Informational, Not IdeologicalDean Baker
The Exchange (Yahoo! Finance), January 9, 2013
Dean Baker / January 10, 2013
Article Artículo
Thomas Edsall Says America's Businesses Have Their Backs Against the WallDean Baker / January 10, 2013
Article Artículo
Are Profits Making Us Sick? The Case of the Health Care IndustryDean Baker / January 10, 2013
Article Artículo
Lessons on Global Warming and the Debt for Thomas FriedmanDean Baker / January 10, 2013
Article Artículo
Latin America and the Caribbean
What the Venezuelan Constitution Does, and Does Not, SayThe Venezuelan government announced Tuesday that President Hugo Chávez will miss his swearing in on Thursday, January 10, when his new term is set to begin. The Supreme Court ruled today that his swearing in tomorrow would not be necessary for “continuity” of his administration, and that he could be sworn in before the Court at a later date.
Returning from a meeting with Venezuelan Vice-President Nicolás Maduro, Brazilian Foreign Minister Marco Aurelio Garcia said Tuesday that Brazil regards as constitutional the extension of time needed to swear in Chávez as president for his new term, saying the current debate can be solved through "constitutional means,” as Venezuela’s El Universal newspaper reported. Several heads of state or other high level officials from Latin American governments will be present at events at the presidential palace in Caracas tomorrow.
Despite some confusion and deliberate distortions in the media and among Venezuela observers, the Venezuelan constitution (English PDF version here; Spanish version here) is clear on procedure regarding what is allowed if the president-elect is unable to be sworn in in Caracas.
For example, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R – FL), who has infamously called for Fidel Castro’s assassination in the past, issued a hyperbolic statement accusing Chávez of attempting to subvert the constitution:
The delay of his swearing-in is yet another example of the trampling of the constitution by this despot. The Venezuelan constitution states that the leader of Venezuela needs to take the oath of office on January 10 in front of the National Assembly or the Venezuelan Supreme Tribunal of Justice.
But Article 231 states, in part, “If for any supervening reason, the person elected President of the Republic cannot be sworn in before the National Assembly, he shall take the oath of office before the Supreme Tribunal of Justice.” No deadline is mentioned, contrary to what Ros-Lehtinen claims. Ros-Lehtinen also stated:
CEPR / January 09, 2013
Article Artículo
Haiti by the Numbers, Three Years LaterCEPR / January 09, 2013