Article Artículo
Faith-Based Economics at the European Central BankDean Baker / April 11, 2012
report informe
The Impact on Inequality of Raising the Social Security Retirement AgeDean Baker and David Rosnick / April 11, 2012
Article Artículo
Mélenchon Could Change French Politics With Strong ShowingMark Weisbrot / April 10, 2012
Article Artículo
Low-Wage Jobs to Blame for Slow Economic RecoveryEileen Appelbaum / April 10, 2012
Article Artículo
Since When Did Unionized Autoworkers Become Republican and Family Farmers and Doctors Become Democrats?Dean Baker / April 10, 2012
Article Artículo
More Musings on Modern Monetary TheoryI had several people ask me in comments or e-mails whether I agreed with Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) that the government doesn't need to raise taxes to pay for spending or whether I agreed with Paul Krugman that it does. I won’t claim to know exactly Paul Krugman’s view on the topic, but let me reframe the issue somewhat in a way that may cause people to see differently what is in dispute.
I think that all MMTers believe that the government cannot literally spend without limits. In other words, we can push the economy to the point where inflation is a real problem. The MMT answer is to raise taxes to prevent inflation from getting out of control.
Now suppose we are in the world where we have pushed the economy to the point where inflation is a problem and we decide we want the government to spend more money on some great project. At that point, it would seem that MMTers would have to agree that we need tax increases to offset the impact of government spending in boosting the economy.
We don’t literally need the tax increases to pay for the spending. The Fed could simply create more money to finance the spending. However if we don’t want the spending to be inflationary, then it must be offset by a tax increase.
I think the difference between the MMTers and Krugman is largely on the frequency with which they believe that the economy is up against its capacity constraints so that inflation is a real issue. I don’t want to put words in Krugman’s blog, but my guess is that he believes that the U.S. economy is typically operating near its capacity, so that the story of needing tax increases to offset spending would in general apply.
CEPR / April 09, 2012
Article Artículo
Obama and Romney are Politicians, not VisionariesDean Baker / April 09, 2012
Article Artículo
The Weather and the U.S. EconomyDean Baker / April 09, 2012
Article Artículo
Robert Samuelson Shows that the Post Has no Fact Checkers on Its Opinion PagesDean Baker / April 09, 2012
Article Artículo
The Secret Source of Economic Weakness: The Trade DeficitDean Baker / April 09, 2012
Article Artículo
James B. Stewart Declares Himself Clueless About the Ryan BudgetDean Baker / April 08, 2012
Article Artículo
Falling Coverage Rates: One Reason Government Surveys May Not Show a Rise in PovertyDean Baker / April 08, 2012
Article Artículo
Labor Market Policy Research Reports, April 2 – 6, 2012The following papers are highlights this week in labor market policy research:
Center for American Progress
Taking Action on Clean Energy and Climate Protection in 2012: A Menu of Effective and Feasible Solutions
Jason Walsh and Kate Gordon
Center for Economic and Policy Research
Low-wage Workers Are Older and Better Educated than Ever
John Schmitt and Janelle Jones
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
The Impact of State Income Taxes on Low-Income Families In 2011
Phil Oliff, Chris Mai, and Nicholas Johnson
Tax Foundation Figures Do Not Represent Typical Households’ Tax Burdens: Figures May Mislead Policymakers, Journalists, and the Public
Chuck Marr and Chye-Ching Huang
The Texas Economic Model: Hard For Other States to Follow and Not All It Seems
Elizabeth McNichol and Nicholas Johnson
CEPR and / April 06, 2012
Article Artículo
Sharp Slowdown in March Jobs Numbers, Wages Remain StagnantDean Baker / April 06, 2012
Article Artículo
Job Growth Slows Sharply In March, Unemployment Edges Down to 8.2 PercentDean Baker / April 06, 2012