Article Artículo
Can the Greek People Teach the ECB Economics?Dean Baker
May 19, 2011, International Relations and Security Network
Dean Baker / May 19, 2011
Article Artículo
More Bad Housing PolicyDean Baker
May 19, 2011, The Guardian Unlimited
Dean Baker / May 19, 2011
report informe
Labor Market Policy in the Great Recession: Some Lessons from Denmark and GermanyJohn Schmitt / May 19, 2011
Article Artículo
Senator Coburn Still Doesn't Know About the Housing BubbleDean Baker / May 19, 2011
Article Artículo
Chris Farrell Is Mistaken, Pension Funds Will Get 8 Percent ReturnsDean Baker / May 19, 2011
Article Artículo
The U.S. Has "Free Trade" Agreements, not Free Trade AgreementsDean Baker / May 19, 2011
Article Artículo
What Do You Know, the Recession Is Actually Serious Bad NewsDean Baker / May 19, 2011
Article Artículo
Why Do Opponents of Social Security Have So Much Difficulty Getting Their Facts Right?The obvious answer is because it doesn’t matter. Those pushing for cuts in Social Security and the other big items on the right’s agenda can get the basic facts about Social Security, the budget and the economy wrong over and over again and it doesn’t in any way affect their standing in the public debate on these issues. One need only look at the career of former Senator Alan Simpson, who has repeatedly shown that he doesn’t have the most basic understanding of the finances of the Social Security system, yet is still seen as a respected voice on this topic.
In keeping with this “ignore the facts” approach, the Progressive Policy Institute recently released a paper by Sylvester Schieber telling readers that Franklin Roosevelt would be pushing large cuts in Social Security benefits for middle income workers. Schieber and the Progressive Policy Institute have been pushing cuts to Social Security for close to two decades so it is not exactly surprising that they would be trying to take advantage of the current hysteria around the budget deficit to push their agenda on this topic.
What is interesting is that in their eagerness to take money away from ordinary working people they showed even more disregard for the facts than usual. They referred to the Center for Economic and Policy Research as “a research arm of the AFL-CIO.”
Why would Mr. Schieber and the Progressive Policy Institute think that CEPR is a research arm of the AFL-CIO? CEPR lists our funders on its website, which clearly states that “CEPR does not receive any funding from corporations, unions, or foreign governments”. Neither the AFL-CIO nor any individual unions appear on this page. Or, they could have looked to the 990 forms filed with the IRS every year. In fact, CEPR provides a link to our financial forms on the sidebar on nearly every page of our website.
It’s possible that Schieber and the Progressive Policy Institute live in some crazy fantasy world, but it’s more likely that they just assumed that because CEPR has been aggressive in telling the truth and confronting misinformation from Wall Street funded organizations, that it must be on the payroll of the AFL-CIO.
CEPR / May 18, 2011
Article Artículo
Will the Cartagena mediation process help resolve the crisis in Honduras?Alexander Main / May 17, 2011
Article Artículo
According to Economists, Increased Pension Payments by Federal Employers are a Cut in PayDean Baker / May 17, 2011
Article Artículo
The Post Thinks That Its Readers Have More Time to Study Budget Proposals Than Its ReportersDean Baker / May 17, 2011
Article Artículo
How Does the Post Know the Way Republicans "Regard" the Health Insurance Exchanges In the ACA?Dean Baker / May 17, 2011