Article Artículo
David Brooks Argues That If We Were More Moral, We Would Throw Millions More Out of WorkDean Baker / March 06, 2012
Article Artículo
BorderlineJohn Schmitt / March 05, 2012
Article Artículo
Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the Bowles-Simpson Commission ReportDean Baker / March 05, 2012
Article Artículo
Sachs' Candidacy Sets Stage for Public Debate Over World Bank ReformDan Beeton / March 05, 2012
Article Artículo
Should Presidential Candidates Be Afraid to Talk about Declining Mobility and Growing Inequality?John Schmitt and Shawn Fremstad / March 05, 2012
Article Artículo
There Is Little Disagreement That Drilling Off the U.S. Coast Will Have Almost Zero Impact on the Price of GasDean Baker / March 05, 2012
Article Artículo
Will the French Have to Work Fewer Hours to Compete With Germany?Dean Baker / March 04, 2012
Article Artículo
Only in the Washington Post: No Link Between Growth and JobsDean Baker / March 04, 2012
Article Artículo
Ireland's Economy Is Slumping BECAUSE It Is Following the ECB-IMF Bailout ProgramDean Baker / March 03, 2012
Article Artículo
Latin America and the Caribbean
Do Environmentalists Have An Interest In Who Controls Oil Resources?Mark Weisbrot / March 03, 2012
Article Artículo
Labor Market Policy Research Reports, Feb. 27 – March 2, 2012CEPR and / March 02, 2012
Article Artículo
Evaluation of Donor Response to Haiti Earthquake Shows "Building Back Better" Nothing But a SloganFor the previous five years an independent organization, DARA, has been publishing the Humanitarian Response Index (HRI). The DARA website explains the HRI as “the world’s only independent tool for measuring the individual performance and commitment of government donors to apply the principles of Good Humanitarian Donorship which they agreed to in 2003.” (To learn more about the HRI, see the DARA website).
Unlike other independent evaluations which have focused as much on NGO behavior as donors, the 2011 HRI Haiti report focuses almost exclusively on the donor side of the equation. The report finds a host of missed opportunities, skewed priorities, a lack of coordination and perhaps most importantly, a shortage of communication with both the Haitian government and Haitian people. The result, as the report concludes, is that:
The international community cannot claim that it has helped Haiti build back better, and missed an opportunity to redress years of neglect and inattention to the issue of building capacity, resilience and strengthening preparedness for future crises.
Coordination and Local Input
While the HRI report found that coordination among international actors was relatively good, this “came at the price of better engagement and ownership of local actors.” A problem that has been mentioned numerous times before was the holding of meetings at the UN Logistics base, which the report notes “excluded local NGOs: there was no mechanism by which the large number of Haitian NGOs could be identified or contacted, and their participation was physically limited by making their entry difficult to the logistics base and by convening cluster meetings in English.”
One interviewee told the report’s authors:
“Donors having meetings in a military base in a humanitarian crisis makes no sense and the fact that they still do it one year and a half later is even worse. It hampers participation. Haitians are totally excluded. Many people can’t enter because there are strict controls at the entrance. As Haitians it’s harder for them to get through.”
The report suggests that rather than housing UN operations on a military base, “UN agencies and clusters should have been physically based within government ministries, to expedite their re-building and support their efforts.”
Many organizations also criticized donors for being “inflexible in allowing Haitian NGOs to be subgrantees.” One exception to this was Spain, which required that NGOs partner with local organizations. Canada also set some money aside specifically to build capacity of local NGOs. The U.S. government on the other hand was “criticized…for being confusing, non-transparent and inward-looking, despite their large presence."
As an interviewee explained:
USAID has had a complete bunker mentality. It’s impossible to have any continuity in conversations with them. OFDA had platoons of consultants rotating in and out.
Jake Johnston / March 02, 2012
Article Artículo
More on the Recent Past and Near Future of Economic MobilityJohn Schmitt and Shawn Fremstad / March 02, 2012
Article Artículo
The Washington Post Still Misses the Housing Bubble (European Edition)Dean Baker / March 02, 2012
Article Artículo
The Washington Post Runs a Column Complaining That No One Hears About the Liabilities of Medicare and Social SecurityDean Baker / March 02, 2012