Patents Are a Bad Way to Fund the Development of Drugs #46,541

June 07, 2021

The New York Times reported on the decision by the Food and Drug Administration to approve the drug aducanumab, as a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. According to the piece, it is the first new treatment for the disease in almost two decades.

As the article makes clear, there is no consensus in the scientific community about the effectiveness of the drug. The clinical trials for the drug were not conclusive, according to several experts cited in the piece, and the drug has harmful side effects, the risk of which can easily outweigh any potential benefits.

As the piece points out, the drugs manufacturer Biogen, stands  to make billions of dollars from aducanumab. This gives it a strong incentive to overstate the benefits and downplay the risks. This means that it may pay physicians and patient advocacy groups to promote the drug. (I’m one of those old-fashioned economists who believe that people respond to incentives.)

If the government did not rely on patent monopolies to finance the development of drugs, it would mean that no one would have the same sort of incentive to push drugs that are not safe and effective.


Support Cepr


If you value CEPR's work, support us by making a financial contribution.

Si valora el trabajo de CEPR, apóyenos haciendo una contribución financiera.

Donate Apóyanos

Keep up with our latest news