Ukraine’s IMF Agreement Could Worsen the Country’s Problems

May 29, 2014

Mark Weisbrot
The Chicago Tribune, May 29, 2014

Arizona Daily Star / Tuscon, June 1, 2014
Salt Lake City Sunday Deseret News, June 1, 2014
Schenectady Sunday Gazette (NY), June 1, 2014
Sioux Falls Sunday Argus (SD)), June 1, 2014
Henersonville Sunday Times News (NC) , June 1, 2014
Spartanburg Sunday Journal-Hearld (SC), June 1, 2014
Tuscaloosa Sunday News (AL) ), June 1, 2014
Medford Sunday MAIL Tribune (OR) , June 1, 2014
Y akima Sunday Hearld Republic (WA), June 1, 2014
Gainsville Sunday Times (GA), June 1, 2014
Rome Sunday News-Tribune (GA), June 1, 2014
Kokomo Sunday Tribune (IN), June 1, 2014
Lawton Sunday Constitution (OK), June 1, 2014
Willimantic Sunday Chronicle (CT), June 1, 2014
Lansing Sunday STATE Journal (MI), June 1, 2014
Redding Sunday Record Searchlight (CA), June 1, 2014
Northwest Arkansas Times / Fayettville, May 31, 2014
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette / Little Rock, May 31, 2014
Duluth News-Tribune (MN), May 31, 2014
Salinas Califonian (CA), May 31, 2014
Wapakoneta Daily News (OH), May 31, 2014
New Bedford Standard-Times (MA), May 30, 2014
South Florida Sun-Sentinel / For Lauderdale, May 29, 2014
Janesville Gazette (WI), May 29, 2014
Lake Walworth Today (WI), May 29, 2014
Bellinham Hearld (WA), May 29, 2014
Merced Sun-Star (CA), May 29, 2014
Modesto Bee, May 29, 2014
Anchorage Daily News (AK), May 29, 2014
Island Packet / Hilton Head (SC), May 29, 2014
Beaufort Gazette (SC), May 29, 2014
Bradenton Hearld (FL), May 29, 2014
Fresno Bee, May 29, 2014
Hanover Evening Sun (PA), May 29, 2014
McClatchy-Tribune News Service, May 29, 2014

See article on original website

On Sunday May 25, the “Chocolate King” handily won the Ukrainian presidential elections in the first round. Billionaire Petro O. Poroshenko is so named because he made his fortune in the confectionary business. The defeated runner-up, former prime minister Yulia V. Tymoshenko is someTimes referred to as “the Gas Princess,” since she struck it rich in the energy sector. It seems that Ukraine has not yet achieved the nominal separation of oligarchy and state that we have in the United States, and being extremely rich is almost a constitutional requirement to run for president – like being at least 35 years old and a natural-born citizen is here.

The U.S. government, which has invested billions of dollars over the past 20 years to bring Ukraine into its political/military alliance in the region, seems pleased with the result. It has become standard operating procedure to get an elected government as soon as possible after a coup such as the one that toppled the prior elected (also super-rich) President Viktor Yanukovych in February with help from Western governments. Yanukovych, who tried to balance his government between the competing interests of the U.S./EU and Russia, never really had a chance. If he had agreed to the IMF conditions, his government would probably have become at least as unpopular as it did when he turned to Russia for a desperately-needed $15 billion dollar loan.

Which brings us to today: the new government of the Chocolate King is committed to those same conditions, now spelled out in an IMF agreement released at the end of April. I would not want to be in his shoes. After two years of almost no economic growth, the IMF is now projecting a steep recession for this year, with the economy shrinking by 5 percent. This is largely because of budget tightening that the government has committed to, amounting to about 3 percent of GDP over the next two years. (For comparison, think of the U.S. government cutting $500 billion, roughly the equivalent of the Pentagon’s annual base allocation, from its budget over two years.) The economy is supposed to recover next year, but we have heard that before – think of Greece, or Spain, or eurozone austerity generally over the past four years.

Poroshenko took a hard line against Russia during his electoral campaign, which was not surprising since millions of Russian-speaking voters in eastern Ukraine would not be voting anyway – some because they didn’t consider the election legitimate and many because armed militants closed the polling places. But he has since become friendlier, emphasizing his good personal relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. This is probably a smart move, and not only because Russia can help him negotiate an end to the civil conflict. (Recent events indicate that Russia may have less influence on separatists in eastern Ukraine than the U.S. and EU have on their allies in the west.)

As it turns out, Putin does not appear interested in annexing more pieces of a divided Ukraine, contrary to the assertions of some in the U.S. His main goal seems more likely to be preventing Ukraine from becoming another base for the NATO military alliance, on its border, which in Russia is understandably seen as a threat. (NATO added 12 countries from Eastern Europe between 1999-2009.) And this could be better achieved through negotiations. As for Poroshenko, depending on how badly things go with the IMF/EU program, he may end up needing help from Russia after all. At the very least he wouldn’t want to leave himself completely at the mercy of the IMF-Washington-EU decision-makers. They have a plan to restructure Ukraine’s economy, and it could turn out to be a mass-unemployment nightmare.

Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, D.C. He is also President of Just Foreign Policy ( ) .


Support Cepr


If you value CEPR's work, support us by making a financial contribution.

Si valora el trabajo de CEPR, apóyenos haciendo una contribución financiera.

Donate Apóyanos

Keep up with our latest news